|
|
|
R v A sub nom R v Y
17.05.2001
[2001] UKHL 251, [2002] AC 45, [2001] 2 Cr App R 351,
Court:
House of Lords
The test of admissibility of evidence of previous sexual relations between a complainant and an accused in a rape trial in respect of s.41 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, was whether the evidence and questioning concerning it was so relevant to the issue of consent.
20.12.2001
The return of a convicted Italian citizen to serve a sentence for armed robbery was neither oppressive nor unjust. More...
07.12.2001
Where a conspiracy straddled the date of amendments made to the Criminal Justice Act 1988 by the Proceeds of Crime Act 1995 coming into force, the amendments did not apply... More...
06.12.2001
This case concerned the Stansted Hijacking. Nine Afghan defendants were convicted of hijacking an Afghan Ariana Boeing 727 during an internal flight from Afghanistan in February 2001. More...
R v Martin
The Times, 1 November 2001; [2002] 2 WLR 1; [2002] 1 Crim App Rep 27
30.10.2001
In a case that became a “cause celebre” for law and order campaigners, an appellant's murder conviction for shooting at two burglars in his home, killing one of them, was... More...
19.10.2001
This was a large scale inquiry into numerous deaths at a care home said to have been caused by inappropriate feeding methods. There were legal issues on the manslaughter charges... More...
01.08.2001
This complex appeal was brought by six defendants due to be tried for conspiracy to cheat the Inland Revenue of VAT, with a loss of public funds amounting to £11,000,000. In a... More...
26.07.2001
The Court of Appeal considered the contrast between money laundering in relation to drug trafficking (under s.49(2) Drug Trafficking Act 1994) and money laundering in relation to other serious... More...
24.07.2001
In this tax fraud case, the Divisional Court (by case stated) held that there was no basis for interfering with the judge's conclusion that there was no evidence... More...
14.07.2001
A five-judge Court of Appeal, presided over by the Lord Chief Justice, held that the statutory guidance, contained in Chapter 7 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, for determining the... More...
14.06.2001
Before the Lord Chief Justice: Application for judicial review of the trial judge’s refusal to dismiss a charge of theft. Application dismissed: A director was capable in law of stealing... More...
R v Claydon and ors
The Times, 13 February 2004, [2001] EWCA Crim 1359 [2004] 1 W.L.R. 1575 [2004] 1 Cr. App. R. 36
13.06.2001
Appeals against rulings on evidence as part of the preparatory hearing in fraud and other long and complex trials. More...
R v Zelzele and ors
[2001] EWCA Crim 1763; (2001) Crim LR 830 : LTL 29/10/2001 : (2002) 1 CAR(S) 261 : (2002) 1 CAR(S) 62
12.06.2001
Where a confiscation hearing had been adjourned beyond the six-month period after conviction. More...
14.05.2001
In accordance with the spirit of Art.6((c)) of the European Convention on Human Rights, an interpreter who was present during an interview between a solicitor and client was bound by... More...
R v Weir
[2001] 1 W.L.R. 421 [2001] 2 All E.R. 216 [2001] 2 Cr. App. R. 9; Times, February 9, 2001
02.05.2001
This high-profile appeal in a murder case examined the effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the Director of Public Prosecutions. More...
01.05.2001
Guidelines on sentencing those convicted of handling stolen goods were given in the light of proposals of the Sentencing Advisory Panel. More...
11.04.2001
The status of facial mapping expert evidence based on unlawful videotaping. More...
R v G and ors
[2001] EWCA Crim 442; [2002] 1 WLR 200; [2002] 1 Cr App R 147
28.03.2001
The Crown applied to appeal an interlocutory ruling in a tax fraud case. The Crown’s evidence concerned a global conspiracy, but 80% of that evidence had been ruled before trial... More...
16.03.2001
This was the first prosecution to come before a criminal court in England involving infringement of Microsoft's copyright and design rights. More...
14.01.2001
The Privy Council held where there was evidence sufficient to establish provocation, the proviso to s.39(1) West Indies Associated States Supreme Court Act 1969 could not be applied. More...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
